The Age of Entanglement: When Quantum Physics Was Reborn | 
enlarge | Author: Louisa Gilder Publisher: Knopf Category: Book
List Price: $27.50 Buy New: $18.15 You Save: $9.35 (34%)
New (34) Used (10) from $15.98
Avg. Customer Rating: 6 reviews Sales Rank: 15886
Media: Hardcover Edition: 1 Number Of Items: 1 Pages: 464 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 9.4 x 6.5 x 1.7
ISBN: 1400044170 Dewey Decimal Number: 530.12 EAN: 9781400044177 ASIN: 1400044170
Publication Date: November 11, 2008 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
A brilliantly original and richly illuminating exploration of entanglement, the seemingly telepathic communication between two separated particles—one of the fundamental concepts of quantum physics.
In 1935, in what would become the most cited of all of his papers, Albert Einstein showed that quantum mechanics predicted such a correlation, which he dubbed “spooky action at a distance.” In that same year, Erwin Schrdinger christened this spooky correlation “entanglement.” Yet its existence wasn’t firmly established until 1964, in a groundbreaking paper by the Irish physicist John Bell. What happened during those years and what has happened since to refine the understanding of this phenomenon is the fascinating story told here.
We move from a coffee shop in Zurich, where Einstein and Max von Laue discuss the madness of quantum theory, to a bar in Brazil, as David Bohm and Richard Feynman chat over cervejas. We travel to the campuses of American universities—from J. Robert Oppenheimer’s Berkeley to the Princeton of Einstein and Bohm to Bell’s Stanford sabbatical—and we visit centers of European physics: Copenhagen, home to Bohr’s famous institute, and Munich, where Werner Heisenberg and Wolfgang Pauli picnic on cheese and heady discussions of electron orbits.
Drawing on the papers, letters, and memoirs of the twentieth century’s greatest physicists, Louisa Gilder both humanizes and dramatizes the story by employing their own words in imagined face-to-face dialogues. Here are Bohr and Einstein clashing, and Heisenberg and Pauli deciding which mysteries to pursue. We see Schrdinger and Louis de Broglie pave the way for Bell, whose work is here given a long-overdue revisiting. And with his characteristic matter-of-fact eloquence, Richard Feynman challenges his contemporaries to make something of this entanglement.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 1 more reviews...
One Hundred Years of Entanglement December 23, 2008 4 out of 5 found this review helpful
I found this book a remarkable read. The author vividly dramatizes the story of quantum entanglement by recreating documented encounters between the physicist protagonists. The story begins with quantum pioneers Einstein, Bohr, Schrodinger and others early last century, who first discovered entanglement and struggled to come to terms with its so bizarre consequences for how we picture Nature at the fundamental level. The book leaves off with contemporary quantum physicists Zeilinger, Gisin and others and tells the still unfinished story about how we are now exploiting entanglement for such applications as quantum cryptography and quantum computing. Along the way, we meet and get to know the middle generations of physicists such as Bell, Shimony and Clauser who were the first to courageously set out and find ways to explore quantitatively how our apparent classical world differs from our underlying entangled world as described by quantum mechanics.
To my knowledge, no other popular book covers such a wide span of history on this subject and with a combination of such literary elegance and scientific accuracy. The book will inspire many a reader young and old to delve further into the wonderful and fascinating mysteries of the quantum world.
Entangled (Mis-) Comprehension December 16, 2008 3 out of 10 found this review helpful
I've read at least 20 books on the history of quantum mechanics and the evolution of quantum theory and think I've got a pretty good grasp of the arguments and history. So -
1) This book confuses me. The author is a talented writer but doesn't seem to grasp the essential arguments. It's as if she was learning a language phonetically without any understanding! To wit -
Einstein's EPR paper has always been thought of as being contradicted by the subsequent experimental confirmation of Bell's Inequality. This confirmation has always been thought to support Bohr's position in Bohr's 1938 argument with Einstein, yet the author posits that Einstein's work begat Bell.
Well, yes... but only to refute his argument!
Bell's work (and subsequent experimental confirmation) proved non-locality and non-causality, the dreaded "spooky actions at a distance" that Einstein abhorred.
Einstein lost this battle, but the author somehow thinks he was a victor because he said quantum mechanics "wasn't complete" and entanglement was a new/further twist on the subject.
Well, that's like winning $10 on one stock, but losing $1000 on each of two other stocks (non-locality, non-causality)!!
(And major PS: Einstein is my intellectual hero. Even when wrong, he made other people think more deeply and clearly.)
2) The author's train of thought throughout the history isn't precise enough and the arguments between the combatants are somewhat muddled.
3) Although the author brings the `arguments' into the new millennium, she completely ignores Everett's `Many Worlds' hypothesis, one of the major interpretations of quantum mechanics/theory.
Well, two stars for the effort, I guess. It would have been a wonderful approach if she had really understood the subject matter and had also included the many worlds interpretation.
For a much better handling of this subject (and a thrilling read)... try EINSTEIN DEFIANT by Bolles which reconstructs the very same material, but much more deeply and clearly.
My take on the whole thing?
The history and evolution of quantum theory/quantum mechanics is analogous to a collection of great short stories authored by several great writers.
The General Theory of Relativity is analogous to War and Peace, one truly great novel by one great author.
Einstein's... THE MAN.
fiction December 11, 2008 6 out of 14 found this review helpful
Gilder has clearly saturated herself in this material. But she has mixed up fact and fiction. In one instance the has a dialogue between three people only two of whom were actually there. She has, for example, taken interviews of mine and added fictional gloss which distorts the context of these interviews. This is a wonderful subject without Gilder's inventions.
A true joy to read! December 9, 2008 5 out of 5 found this review helpful
This is a wonderful book, particularly if, like me, you've been traumatized by successive exposure to other books purporting to explain quantum physics to the layman. The more you read them, it seems, the less you understand. Just cracking open some of these things will drop your IQ five percentage points. Louisa Gilder's book is entirely different: it opens up the world of 20th century physics like never before, making all those iconic figures - from Einstein to Schrdinger to Niels Bohr -- into human beings. Written with the grace and beauty of an accomplished novelist, Entanglement gave me hope - first that I might begin to "get" this stuff, but more importantly, that the newest discoveries of science might just be brining meaning back into the world. A true joy to read!
The creative and insightful history of science's next big thing November 30, 2008 11 out of 11 found this review helpful
Louisa Gilder's new book is about abstract science and the very real people who clash (and collaborate) over its truth and meaning. *The Age of Entanglement* is an old story with a new perspective, a dramatic new telling -- and a new ending. An ending that shows Einstein was right and launches quantum physics toward its next great chapter.
All the old characters are here -- Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrdinger (who coined the word "entanglement"), Pauli, Born, Dirac, de Broglie, and of course Einstein, who thought "spooky action at a distance" was implausible yet found Bohr's entire quantum mechanical philosophy even less convincing. Unlike other tellings, however, Gilder vividly deploys their actual words from speeches, papers, letters, and memoirs to recreate the intense conversations and rancorous debates that toppled the Newtonian world. Our new understanding of entanglement, moreover, changes the very nature of the old quantum debates. Gilder's description of Schrdinger's epiphany that led to his wave equation is almost euphorically exciting and inspiring.
Despite the quantum revolution, big questions remained, questions that only Einstein, Schrdinger and few others had the courage to raise. And now enters the new cast -- Robert Oppenheimer, John von Neumann, David Bohm, Richard Feynman, and the particle smashing Irishman John Bell, who from the early 1960s through his untimely death in 1990 showed entanglement was real. Bell is perhaps the most-important-little-known physicist, and Gilder brings the late CERN engineer-theorist to life just as his work has become the most-cited in all of physics and is breaking out across the scientific and technological frontiers.
From Vienna, Solvay, and Copenhagen to Rio, Princeton, Berkeley, Geneva, and back to Vienna, the reader is there for Bell's intuitive breakthrough that brought the 1935 Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paper out of laughable obscurity back to forefront of the debate (EPR argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete). And you are in the basement room where the experimentalists John Clauser and Dick Holt constructed the awkward tubular photon-counter that first proved the entanglement that years later multi-kilometer fiber-optic rings around Geneva would show with even greater precision.
Waves or particles, statistics or reality, mind or matter, information or physics, these are some of the biggest questions we know. This is the mystery of the entanglement that, although still not fully understood, is even now spawning new technologies like quantum cryptography and quantum computing and which, as you will find at the end of Gilder's great book, somehow connects the universe across the generations.
-Bret Swanson
---------------
Here is Gilder (on page 242) recounting a typically rich offering from the understated but always logical John Bell:
Bell looked at Jauch as if he wasn't quite certain the other hadn't been making a joke. "I have a question about complementarity," he said, in the voice of one who is changing the topic slightly. "Because it seems to me that Bohr used the word with the reverse of its usual meaning." He grinned, tipping he head to the side. "Consider, for example, the elephant. From the front she is head, trunk, and two legs. From the back she is bottom, tail, and two legs. From the sides she is otherwise, and from the top and bottom different again. These various views are complementary in the usual sense of the word. The supplement one another, they are consistent with one another, and they are all entailed by the unifying concept `elephant.'" Bell's hands gestured to suggest this. His eyebrows then lowered. "But Bohr, Bohr wouldn't -- it's my impression that to suppose Bohr used the word in this ordinary way would have been regarded by him as missing his point and trivializing his thought. He seems to insist rather that we must use in our analysis elements which contradict one another, which do not add up to, or derive from, a whole. By `complementary' he meant, it seems to me, the reverse: contradictariness."
|
|
|
|